Footnote 1, Chapter 5, Page 117:

Four figures provided below indicate the percentages of each continent’s cases found to have evidence of the four consociational components. * The question corresponding to independent variable #1, which indicates the presence of Somewhat Inclusive Executives, is: Is there evidence that one or more MAR groups, which do not comprise all of their country’s MAR groups and are not identified as ”advantaged” in Gurr’s dataset, are represented in the governing executive? * The question corresponding to independent variable #2, which indicates the presence of Highly Inclusive Executives, is: Is there evidence that all of a country’s MAR groups, which may be only one and are not identified as ”advantaged” in Gurr’s dataset, are represented in the governing executive? * Each case corresponds to one year of a country’s experience. Figure 5.2 * The question corresponding to the Segmental Autonomy variable is: Is there evidence in this dataset that MAR groups had the power to govern some aspects of their lives autonomously? * Each case corresponds to one year of a country’s experience. Figure 5.3 * The question corresponding to the MV variable is: If it is assumed that “Minorities at Risk” groups can gain representation in legislative bodies in proportion to their sizes, does their country’s constitution indicate that they could possibly exert a veto resulting in a changed policy decision? * Each case corresponds to one year of a country’s experience. Figure 5.4 * The question corresponding to the PR variable is: If there is electoral competitiveness, is there PR? * Each case corresponds to one year of a country’s experience.